Of Mice and Men
by John Steinbeck Genre: novella, fiction, tragedy First published 1937
|
Why is this book being challenged?
Reading Of Mice and Men makes me incredibly uncomfortable. There is an underlying, casual display of racism, sexism, and ableism within the words and actions of many (if not all) of the characters. The most egregious of these is the racism–for half of the book, for example, the only Black character goes entirely unnamed as he is referred to almost exclusively via racial slur. When he is finally named, it’s quite clear that it still isn’t his given name that’s provided; he has been crippled by a back injury that has left him with a crooked spine, and the name he is given is “Crooks.”
The racism directed against Crooks within the book is blatant, but Steinbeck’s treatment of this character is not so straightforward. As Lennie converses with Crooks, the focus is on how lucky Lennie is to have George, and how this contrasts with the damaging loneliness Crooks feels as the only Black man working on the ranch–he isn’t allowed in the bunk house, and is left alone with only himself and some books for company most of the time. There is also an explicit acknowledgement of how dangerous the threat of a white woman’s tears is for a Black man depicted when Curley’s wife enters the scene:
“Listen, N–,” she said. “You know what I can do to you if you open your trap?”
Crooks stared hopelessly at her, and then he sat down on his bunk and drew into himself.
She closed on him. “You know what I could do?”
Crooks seemed to grow smaller, and he pressed himself against the wall. “Yes, ma’am.”
“Well, you keep your place then, N–. I could get you strung up on a tree so easy it ain’t even funny.”
Crooks had reduced himself to nothing. There was no personality, no ego–nothing to arouse either like or dislike. He said, “Yes, ma’am,” and his voice was toneless.
For a moment she stood over him as though waiting for him to move so that she could whip at him again; but Crooks sat perfectly still, his eyes averted, everything that might be hurt drawn in. She turned at last to the other two.
Old Candy was watching her, fascinated. “If you was to do that, we’d tell,” he said quietly. “We’d tell about you framin’ Crooks.”
“Tell an’ be damned,” she cried. “Nobody’s listen to you, an’ you know it. Nobody’d listen to you.”
Candy subsided. “No . . .” he agreed. “Nobody’d listen to us.”
Of Mice and Men, pp.78-79
While a distinction should be made between depicting racism and being racist, that is often complicated by the fact that the very existence of slurs (such as the N-word) in a book can be harmful; teaching a book that includes such language risks introducing harmful slurs to a classroom environment that should be a safe space for all students.
In a 2020 article for Book Riot, Enobong Essien makes a point that assigning and reading texts which contain slurs does not mean giving students permission to give voice to those slurs. She gives the example of her sister teaching Of Mice and Men in her classroom:
At the beginning of her lesson, she handed each student in her class a sticker to place in the front of their book. This note is a reminder to every student that the use of the n-word and other such words is a hate crime and will result in expulsion if the word is used in her classroom. Even when they are reading the book out loud as a class, she is the only person allowed to use the word. Everyone else must say “the n-word”. They can say the word in their heads, but they are not to use it out loud. All racial slurs continue to be banned in her literature class, regardless of whether they’re in a book or not.
Final Thoughts
While I don’t think that Of Mice and Men should be banned from classrooms or otherwise censored, I do think that how we teach this book is incredibly important. Any teaching of this book should be paired with a strong condemnation of the racist language and slurs within it that is not softened by some excuse centered around how the 1930s were ‘a different time.’ There needs to be an emphasis on how ‘that’s how things were’ isn’t at all the same as ‘that’s how things should be’–and how we can, and should, do better.
I do also think that, while Of Mice and Men is a valuable piece of literature, we should be doing more to diversify the literature that we teach in our classrooms. Whatever else is true of Of Mice and Men, it is also true that it is yet another piece of classic literature which was written by a White man–White male authors have dominated the literary space and our classroom reading lists for far too long. Sure, many of their books do remain valuable, good pieces of literature, but not every good book deserves a place in standard curriculum. More places should go to promoting too-long-silenced and underrepresented voices, such as that of BIPOC authors.
A Challenged Books Challenge
The next book I will be reviewing is The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison. Look for that review here on my blog on August 20.